練習卷分析(只提供英文版)

January 16, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Science, Health Science, Pediatrics
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download 練習卷分析(只提供英文版)...

Description

Feedback on HKDSE Practice Papers

School Leaders’ Briefing Session 5 March 2012

HKDSE Practice Papers 

 



Papers for 24 Category A subjects produced to familiarise teachers and students with the format and requirements of the HKDSE exams Funded by EDB Delivered to schools under secure conditions in early January, with provisional marking schemes uploaded the next day for teachers' reference All papers and marking schemes available on HKEAA website from mid February (www.hkeaa.edu.hk/tc/HKDSE/Practice_Papers/index.html)

2

Research Study (Core Subjects) 

 

 

20 schools selected based on 2010 HKCEE results; stratified sampling but on voluntary basis About 2,800 students' scripts collected CEML practice papers taken as school mock exams under standard exam conditions, with HKEAA observer Answers scripts scanned and marked onscreen Marking statistics and samples of performance analysed

3

Research Study (Elective Subjects) 









About 100 to 400 scripts collected from a range of schools Marked and samples of performance analysed Valuable information about actual performance of students Good learning opportunity for HKEAA staff and exam personnel Trial run of marking and grading system 4

Feedback to Schools 







Over 50 briefing sessions conducted for subject teachers between mid January and 29 February Exam requirements, assessment criteria and standards, and annotated samples of performance provided Comments on strengths and weaknesses of candidates and advice given Information available on HKEAA website

5

Limitations of the Research Study   







Sample size Student readiness Marking done by a small proportion of experienced CE/AL examiners/markers Marks for speaking papers collected from schools for reference, not standardised Only paper-level statistics available at this stage Statistical data to be viewed with caution

6

中國語文科

中國語文科設有五卷: 

卷一 ﹕ 閱讀能力(20%),全部試題均須作答



卷二: 寫作能力(20%),要求考生寫長文一篇或 短文二至三篇



卷三: 聆聽能力(10%),全部試題均須作答



卷四: 說話能力(14%),分為「朗讀」及「口語 溝通」兩部分



卷五: 綜合能力考核(16%),全部試題均須作答 8

整體表現數據 卷

分數

平均分 (%) 標準差 (%)

1

84

34.1

11.2

2

206

53.8

12.4

3

84

50.0

10.9

5

100

38.6

9.6 9

卷一 閱讀能力: 篇章取材 與人生和親情有關 《目送》、《認識一個十八歲的人》  與中國文化、文學有關 《史記.儒林列傳》 



結構較緊密 手法能凸顯文章的主旨和立意



具思考空間



10

卷一: 考生的整體表現及常見錯誤 







主要考核考生的閱讀能力,包括理解、分析、感 受、鑑賞、運用不同策略等能力;重視思維和分 析能力,並考核考生對中國文化、文學的認知和 素養。 考生一般於直接考問內容重點的考題或客觀問題 表現甚佳;於辨識寫作和修辭手法的考題則表現 中規中矩 表現有欠理想的題目,包括綜合全文主旨、分析 結構和手法作用,以及理解文言字詞或句式。總 括而言,考生對處理比較說明或發揮個人見解方 面,仍須多加努力。 今次所選的篇章有白話文及文言文,考生一般於 文言篇章表現欠理想。 11

卷二寫作能力 設題要求:考生宜透過審題,思考寫作立意,選取材料,書 寫文章。 審題 第一題:「抉擇」與「瞭解自己」 第二題:「快樂」與「富庶的物質生活」; 「基礎」與「難以」 第三題:「紛爭源於不自知」與圖片寓意 立意 為文章定下主題或主旨,以確立文章的寫作方向。 選材 從個人親身經歷、生活見聞、書本知識、時人雋語去想 像、聯想,再作出分析、比較,然後選取一些具深刻意 義和動人情韻的題材。

表 達 、 組 織 、 書 寫

12

卷二: 評分重點 內容

表達

結構

標點字體

立意深刻、 用詞精確、 選材切當或獨特 文句簡潔流暢、 表達手法純熟靈活

結構緊密、 有條不紊、 輕重有致

標點運用準確、 字體端正美觀

立意明確、 選材恰當

用詞恰當、 文句尚通順、 表達手法平穩

上下文見關聯、 尚具條理、 詳略尚可

標點運用平穩、 字體端正

立意未明、 選材蕪雜

用詞欠準確、 文句冗贅、 表達手法拙劣

上下文沒關聯、 交代紊亂、 詳略失衡

標點運用錯誤、 字體難以辨認

13

錯別字一般評分原則 

0-1個給3分



2-4個給2分



5-7個給1分



8個或以上不給分



重錯不計

14

卷二: 考生整體表現 題目 一:面對重大抉 擇而瞭解自己 二:「快樂」與 「富庶的物質生 活」的關係 三:紛爭源於人 的不自知

選題分布 (%) 49.6

平均分 (%) 56.2

標準差 (%) 12.7

47.9

51.4

11.5

2.5

51.7

14.1

15

卷二: 考生整體表現 







立意與選材:  一般能掌握題目要求。  部分考生立意平凡、選材蕪雜。 詞句與表達手法:  表達大致恰當,文句基本達意,偶有口語或潮語入 文。  未能做到用詞精確,文句簡潔扼要。  少用修辭及表達技巧。 文章組織:  邊寫邊想,沒刻意布局。  少有做到不枝不蔓。 標點字體:  標點大致恰當,但變化較少。  字體較潦草,筆劃模糊。 16

卷三聆聽能力 





第一段錄音  場境:同學一起討論有關神話的戲劇  主題:神話的分類和作用 第二段錄音  場境:戲劇演員跟觀眾交流  主題:演員分享演戲的心得和體會 第三段錄音  場境:課堂討論  主題:神話的意義和價值 17

卷三: 考生整體表現 





考核考生辨明說話者立場、觀點、論據 、說話技巧、語氣等聆聽能力。 考生一般於擷取資訊的題目甚佳;綜合 整理、歸納分類的題目表現中規中矩。 但若試題要求考生依據語境推論分析, 並須簡略說明或發揮個人見解,一般表 現較弱。 部分考生審題不周、答非所問;又或於 答題時詞不達意、概念不清、脫離語境 或理解錯誤。 18

卷五綜合能力考核 題目 試以學生會候選內閣主席文爾雅或武娉娉 的身分,撰寫一篇演講辭,在學生會選舉 諮詢大會上發表,提出所屬內閣的競選口 號。  考核理解、思考、組織、文字表達等能 力。考生須聆聽錄音、閱讀文字圖表後, 再寫作。此卷試題多與生活事務有關。 

19

卷五: 考生整體表現 







考生於演辭格式方面鮮見犯錯,對理念立場亦十分清晰;惟 多有忽略大會背景,於撰寫競選口號表現中規中矩,偶見潮 語英文。至於措辭語氣方面,考生多只能做到有基本禮貌, 得體者少。 於整合拓展資料方面,考生多能整合政綱名稱、措施項目, 但整合資料頗見脫漏,不少漏引調查數據;少引用精確數據 解釋措施之好處。一般考生答題內容字數多惟訊息少。 考生於見解論證方面,一般能依聆聽所指示之方向批評對手 政綱,少數表現佳者意見中肯,有理有據。表現中規中矩的 考生,一般論述未深,理據不多;表現較弱者則只照抄聆聽 考材,而理據薄弱。 考生答題組織大多穩妥,起承轉合,段落分明,但不少考生 時間分配不善,整合拓展多,而見解論證少,以至結構失衡 。考生一般答題時用詞平實,偶有語病,錯別字逾六個者, 為數不少;較少考生能做到文字清通,修飾得宜。 20

English Language

Assessment Framework Component Public exam

School-based assessment

Weighting

Duration

Paper 1 Reading

20%

1 hr 30 mins

Paper 2 Writing

25%

2 hours

Paper 3 Listening & Integrated Skills

30%

2 hours

Paper 4 Speaking

10%

20 minutes

15%

22

Summary Statistics Paper

Max mark Mean (%)

S.D. (%)

1

86

38.2

19.2

2

210

44.0

21.0

3

104

42.7

22.5

23

Paper 2 Writing Part A (10%)  Short, guided task  About 200 words  Situation, purpose & relevant information provided Part B (15%)  Longer, more open-ended task  About 400 words  Choice of one out of 8 questions  Each based on one of the 8 modules in the Elective Part 24

Marking  

Double marking by question Three domains for assessment: Content, Language and Organisation, with equal weighting for each

25

Paper 2 Raw Mark Statistics Paper

Marks awarded per marker

Mean (%)

S.D. (%)

2A

21

8.8 (41.9)

4.5 (21.4)

2B

21

9.8 (46.7)

4.4 (21.0)

26

Paper 2B Raw Mark Statistics Popularity No. of cands.

%

Mean (out of 21)

Drama

210

7.39

6.96

5.54

Short stories

209

7.35

6.33

4.72

Poems & songs

101

3.55

10.77

5.13

Popular culture

174

6.12

7.29

4.8

Theme

S.D. (out of 21)

27

Paper 2B Raw Mark Statistics Theme

Popularity No. of % cands.

Mean (out of 21)

S.D. (out of 21)

Sports comm.

479

16.85

11.02

4.08

Debating

334

11.75

12.05

4.2

Workplace English

852

29.97

9.47

4.08

Social issues

484

17.05

10.91

4.55

28

Advice for Candidates (1)     

Read the questions carefully and try to fulfil all the requirements of the task Develop ideas with examples and supporting details Pay attention to who the writer and the intended readers are Don’t use prepared sentences, paragraphs and stock phrases Memorised paragraphs / essays will be disregarded and not awarded any marks. Zero marks will be given to totally memorised essays 29

Advice for Candidates (2) 





Candidates should not waste time counting the no. of words written. As a general guide, + or – 10% is acceptable (so between 360 to 440 for ‘about 400 words’). Quality is more important than quantity.

30

Paper 1 Reading 

 



Consists of two parts: Part A - Compulsory Part B - Section 1 (easier) Section 2 (more difficult) Candidates choose either Section 1 or 2 Candidates attempting Section 2 can attain up to Level 5** Candidates attempting Section 1 can attain up to Level 4 only 31

Paper 1 Reading Number of scripts Part A 2,839 Part B1 1,431 (~50%) Part B2 1,419 (~50%) * 11 students answered both B1 and B2

32

Results in Part A Part A

Full Mean Mark (%)

SD (%)

Reliability

MCQ

9

57.18

23.33

0.59

Non-MCQ

31

44.83

22.34

0.90

Total:

40

47.61

33

Results in Part B1 Full Mark

Mean (%)

SD (%)

Reliability

MCQ

7

35.38

20.14

0.27

Non-MCQ

36

35.37

20.10

0.89

Total:

43

35.37

Part B1

34

Results in Part B2 Full Mark

Mean (%)

SD (%)

Reliability

MCQ

12

48.83

20.33

0.56

Non-MCQ

34

39.48

18.04

0.86

Total:

46

41.92

Part B1

35

Paper 3 Listening and Integrated Skills Consists of two parts: Part A (compulsory) Part B - Section 1 (easier) - Section 2 (more difficult)  Candidates choose to do either Section 1 or 2  Candidates attempting Section 2 can attain up to Level 5**  Candidates attempting Section1 can attain up to Level 4 only 

36

Paper 3 Listening and Integrated Skills Number of candidates: Part 3A: 2,845 Part 3B1: 1,332 (46.74%) Part 3B2: 1,513 (53.26%)

37

Paper 3A Results

Full Mark Mean (%) 50

49.04

SD (%)

Reliability

24.53

0.95

38

Part 3A Score Distribution

39

Paper 3 Part B1 Results

Task

Full Mark

Mean (%)

SD (%)

Reliability

5

12

40.25

24.83

0.83

6

18

34.13

24.38

0.89

7

18

29.22

24.84

0.87

40

Paper 3 Part B2 Results

Task

Full Mark Mean (%) SD (%)

Reliability

8

18

54.71

18.93

0.81

9

18

53.9

14.83

0.69

10

18

44.87

20.31

0.81

41

Papers 1 and 3: Graded Approach 





Need to convert B1 scores to the same scale as B2 scores After equating, scores can be compared across these two parts of the paper, even though they differ in number of items, difficulty, etc. Paper score = Part A score + Part B score 42

Part 3A Score Distribution

43

How 3B1 Students Performed in 3A

44

How 3B2 Students Performed in 3A

45

Equating (e.g. Paper 3) 3B1 Scores

3B2 scores 54

48 .

. .

. .

. .

. . .

. . .

0

0 46

Equating 3B1 Scores

3B2 scores 54

48 .

. .

. .

. .

. . .

. . .

0

0 47

Equating 3B1 Scores

3B2 scores 54

48 .

. .

. .

. .

. . .

. . .

0

0 48

Equating 3B1 Scores

3B2 scores 54

48 .

. .

. .

. .

. . .

. . .

0

0 49

Part B1 to Part B2 Conversion Factor

Paper 1 3

B1 converted to B2 score Multiply by 0.652 Multiply by 0.735

50

Part B1 to Part B2 Conversion Factor 

Example: Paper 3 Candidate’s score in 3B1 = 26 Candidate’s score after conversion

= 26 x 0.735 = 19

51

Part B1 to Part B2 Conversion Factor In live exam  Carried

out with 70,000+ candidates  More sophisticated method used (see page 19 of ‘Grading Procedures and SRR’ booklet)  ‘Conversion factor’ will vary from paper to paper and from year to year, depending on the difficulty of the items in each part  Maximum level a candidate who attempted B1 can get is Level 4 in the relevant component 52

數學 - 必修部分

試卷一: 考試形式 考試時間 : 2小時15分鐘  佔必修部分 65%  本卷分為兩部,全部題目均須作答  甲部題目範圍為必修部分之基礎課題 及初中課程基礎部分  乙部題目範圍為必修部分及初中課程 基礎部分與非基礎部分 

54

學生表現

滿分

平均分

標準差

105

42.6%

23.2%

55

試卷二: 考試形式 考試時間 : 1小時15分鐘  題目類型:多項選擇題  佔必修部分 35%  本卷分為兩部,全部題目均須作答  甲部佔本卷分數的 2/3  乙部佔本卷分數的 1/3 

56

試卷二: 考試形式 

甲部題目範圍為必修部分之基礎課題 及初中課程基礎部分



乙部題目範圍為必修部分及初中課程 基礎部分與非基礎部分

57

學生表現

滿分

平均分

標準差

45

51.7%

17.5%

58

一般建議 學生應注意下列各點:  審題要小心,表達要清晰及有條理  詳細列出所有算式及清楚解釋如何 從前提得出結論  掌握一些基本的數學課題,如指數 、主項轉換、因式分解、百分數、 線性方程及坐標等 59

一般建議 對數據處理範疇的名詞及其應用有更好 的理解  發展較強的空間感,如在立體圖形中分 辨出直角三角形與非直角三角形  在解三角題過程中充分利用計算機的記 憶空間去儲存較多的有效數字  探索題目不同部分的相互關係 

60

Liberal Studies

Paper Structure 

Paper 1 (50%): Data-response questions  



3 questions All compulsory

Paper 2 (30%): Extended-response questions  

3 extended-response questions Answer one question only 62

Marking 

 

Marked by question Double marking Third marking and fourth marking whenever necessary  Criterion for 3rd marking: >3 marks difference between the first two markers  Criterion for 4th marking: after third marking, no closest pair occurs  4th marking by Chief/Assistant Examiner 63

Paper 1: Data-response Questions  





All questions compulsory Full marks of each question: Q1 (18 marks), Q2 (20 marks), Q3 (20 marks) Mean: Q.1 50.0%, Q.2 44.4%, Q.3 44.2%; paper 46.0% S.D. of paper: 12.5%

39 students (1.4%) got 0 marks in the last question which may be due to their problem with time allocation 64

Paper 2: Extended-response Questions     

Choose ONE question out of three Each question has the same full marks (20 marks) Mean: Q.1 42.2%, Q.2 39.0%, Q.3 52.0%; paper 46.6% S.D. of paper: 16.0% Question popularity:  Q.1 (gender stereotyping): 15%  Q.2 (Chinese economic growth and energy consumption): 30%  Q.3 (ethnic minorities in HK): 55% 65

Marking Guidelines 

 





Suggested marking criteria for each question for markers' reference Not to be regarded as model answers Alternative answers are acceptable as long as they are reasonable Candidates are entitled to take any position they wish on an issue. They are not to be marked on the ‘correctness of their views' or on how close their views correspond to those of the markers. What counts is whether they can put forward a well-reasoned argument for their view. A script scoring the top mark range need not be perfect. It may contain minor flaws in content, approach or presentation. 66

Thank YOU! 67

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF