Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models

January 18, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Science, Health Science, Pediatrics
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models...

Description

Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models Dr Judy Rubinsztein Dr Marelna Van Rensburg Dr Zerak Al-Salihy, Dr Deborah Girling, Dr L ouise Lafortune, Dr Murali Kartha, Prof Carol Brayne

Aims • Evaluate average unit cost to secondary care for patients presenting with memory problems in a Memory Clinic based service (Gp A) and a Traditional ( CMHT based) service ( Gp B). • Evaluate quality of diagnostic service offered to patients and carers.

Methods • Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)

• Questionnaire about quality of diagnostic service provided, devised for study

Unit Costs for Health and Social Care (2011) Service

Consultant Psychiatrist Registrar Ass Sp CMHT ( OP) Psychologist CT/ MRI Psych tests Mileage

Unit Cost (with on costs) £162 £73 £131 £44 £60 £121/£198 £9 54p/mile

Quality Questionnaire: Diagnostic Assessment Response times for assessment Dementia blood screen Pre-diagnostic counselling Examination of cognition, behaviour, functioning Advanced planning discussions Assessment of risk

Typical pathway and costs for Gp A

DV

screen/assign Pre-Dx Counselling

Dx

Post Dx

Office

Advice

Group B

DV (medical)

• No F/U

DV (medical)

• Assign • DVs for post Dx advice, team

Demographics A (n=33)

B (n=33)

Comments

Age (mean)

80

84

0.03 (Significant)

Min-Max

65-92

66-97

Females

58%

67%

MMSE (median)

24

25

NS (n=32 both groups)

ACE-R

67

-

(Gp B, 9 done)

Education

15

15

Not recorded 4 in Gp A, 20 in Gp B

Diagnoses (NS) 60

50

40

30

A (%)

B (%) 20

10

0

AD

VD

LBD

MCI

Depression

Other

Dementia Blood Screen from GP Yes

Group A

Group B

100%

73%

Significantly more in Group A Fisher Exact P=0.02

Pre-Diagnostic Counselling Prediagnostic Counselling

Gp A

GP B

Yes

97%

6%

Highly Significant Difference on Chi Sq

Days to be seen Group A

Group B

Mean days ( SE)

25 ( 2.6)

20 (3.4)

t=1.21

P=0.23 (NS)

Diagnostic Assessment: informal Evidence of informal assessment ( NS differences) in nearly all of patients including assessments of 1) Functioning 2) Behaviour 3) Global severity 4) Depression 5) Carer assessment : Gp A> Gp B

Diagnostic assessment (formal scales) Formal assessment Gp A> Gp B • Functioning (P
View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF