Economic Disadvantage Code Reporting Guidance for 2014-15
Region One Education Service Center October 16, 2014
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Background To Administrator Addressed - Sept 2, 2014 Implementation of the Community Eligibility Program (CEP) by the Texas Department of Agriculture(TDA) Child Nutrition Program (CNP) has prompted TEA to:
• Restate the PEIMS reporting requirements for economically disadvantaged students
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Community Eligibility Provision - CEP Identified Student Percentage (ISP) Identified Student % = # of Identified students Total # of enrolled students with access to NSLP/SBP
X 100
Identified Student/Direct Certified Any student certified without an application and therefore not subject to verification ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Child Nutrition Funding CEP
Provision 2
No Lunch Applications
No Lunch Applications
Identified Student Percentage x 1.6 = CEP% Free
Base Year % of Free & Reduced
Example –
Example –
La Villa 62.5 X 1.6 = 100% paid at Free rate
La Villa 88.74% Paid at Free & Reduce Rate ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
School Districts CEP% Vs Current % School Districts List
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
State Compensatory Enrollment (SCE) CEP SCE – Enrollment Best 6 Months Average for Prior Year
Provision 2 SCE - Enrollment Best 6 Months Average for Prior Year
(Free) Participation
Free & Reduced Participation
SCE Funding
Provision 2 SCE
Basic Allotment x .2 = Approx 1,075 x SCE enrollment
Base Year SCE/Base Year ADA * Prior Year ADA
Greater of SCE Enrollment or Provision 2 SCE
SCE Funding Basic Allotment x .2 = Approx 1,075 x SCE enrollment
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
E-Rate CEP Identified Student Percentage x 1.6 = CEP% Free
Provision 2 Base Year % of Free & Reduced
Income Survey
New Students Only
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
PEIMS - Economic Disadvantage (ED) Identification CEP Students in Direct Certified (DC) List
Provision 2 Base Year % of Free & Reduced
code as 01 - ED
Second & Subsequent year rollover
Income survey for students not on DC List
Income Survey
New Students Only
Annually ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Background To Administrator Addressed - Sept 2, 2014 •
LEA must determine the economic disadvantaged status of each student upon enrollment • Guideline necessary to meet a number of state legislative requirements including: • Student eligibility for prekindergarten programs and • Evaluation of student group performance for state accountability purposes ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
13-14 Economic Disadvantaged Data for LEAs under CEP LEA DONNA IND SCH DIST EXCELLENCE IN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY HARLINGEN CISD LA VILLA ISD LAREDO ISD LASARA ISD LYFORD CISD MCALLEN ISD MERCEDES ISD MONTE ALTO ISD PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD POINT ISABEL ISD PROGRESO I.S.D. RAYMONDVILLE ISD RIO GRANDE CITY CISD RIO HONDO ISD ROMA ISD SAN BENITO ISD SAN PERLITA ISD SANTA MARIA ISD SANTA ROSA ISD UNITED ISD WEBB CISD WESLACO I.S.D. ZAPATA COUNTY ISD
Fall Snapshot % Free % Reduced % Other 10/25/2013 Total PEIMS Code PEIMS Code PEIMS Code Total Economic Enrolled 01 02 99 Disadvantaged % 15,376 4.5% 0.4% 92.3% 97.2% 133 71.4% 12.8% 0.0% 84.2% 18,568 72.4% 6.0% 0.0% 78.5% 637 51.0% 4.1% 36.4% 91.5% 24,955 0.0% 0.0% 97.7% 97.7% 488 2.7% 0.2% 82.2% 85.0% 1,587 0.0% 0.0% 84.5% 84.5% 25,217 0.0% 0.0% 67.2% 67.2% 5,761 0.0% 0.0% 94.5% 94.5% 1,023 0.0% 0.0% 92.8% 92.8% 31,997 0.0% 0.0% 89.1% 89.1% 2,650 3.9% 0.3% 85.1% 89.3% 2,134 83.8% 2.8% 12.9% 99.5% 2,155 0.7% 0.0% 92.3% 93.0% 10,910 21.7% 0.6% 74.0% 96.3% 2,169 0.6% 0.0% 85.5% 86.1% 6,490 15.4% 2.9% 72.9% 91.2% 11,028 0.0% 0.0% 82.9% 83.0% 276 27.5% 4.7% 36.6% 68.8% 727 49.2% 7.4% 39.3% 96.0% 1,176 0.0% 0.2% 96.0% 96.2% 43,575 66.2% 7.2% 0.0% 73.3% 334 59.6% 5.4% 0.0% 65.0% 17,731 0.4% 0.0% 85.2% 85.6% 3,621 51.8% 4.9% 22.6% 79.3% ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
13-14 Economic Disadvantaged Data for Provision 2 and NSLP LEAs LEA BROWNSVILLE ISD EDCOUCH-ELSA ISD EDINBURG CISD GATEWAY ACADEMY HIDALGO ISD IGNITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS JIM HOGG CO I.S.D. LA FERIA I.S.D. LA JOYA I.S.D. LOS FRESNOS CISD MID-VALLEY ACADEMY MISSION C.I.S.D. SOUTH TEXAS EDU. TECHNOLOGY VALLEY VIEW I.S.D. IDEA ACADEMY SAN ISIDRO I.S.D. SHARYLAND ISD SOUTH TEXAS ISD VANGUARD ACADEMY CHARTER
Fall Snapshot % Free % Reduced % Other 10/25/2013 PEIMS PEIMS PEIMS Total Economic Total Enrolled Code 01 Code 02 Code 99 Disadvantaged % NSLP Provision 2 49,370 5,197 34,104 413 3,246 1,063 1,098 3,615 29,711 10,531 411 15,372 1,065 4,622 15,535 258 10,273 3,353 2,112
0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 90.3% 0.0% 83.3% 38.0% 3.1% 3.1% 0.2% 85.2% 0.0% 65.0% 0.0% 73.9% 80.6% 50.9% 49.2% 69.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 5.8% 14.7% 0.5% 1.4% 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 13.4% 0.0% 12.7% 4.7% 8.2% 11.2% 13.2%
95.9% 99.2% 85.1% 0.0% 89.9% 0.2% 27.0% 77.5% 90.4% 75.5% 0.0% 83.9% 3.3% 92.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
96.1% 99.2% 85.1% 94.4% 89.9% 89.4% 79.6% 81.1% 94.9% 75.7% 91.2% 83.9% 81.7% 92.4% 86.5% 85.3% 59.2% 60.5% 82.5%
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
PEIMS Economic Disadvantage Codes 00 Not identified as Economically Disadvantaged
01 Eligible for free lunch based on an approved NSLP application or direct certification (DC) list 02 Eligible for reduced-price meals based on an approved NSLP application
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
PEIMS Economic Disadvantage Codes – Cont. 99 Economically disadvantaged through a means other than an official NSLP application or direct certification under the NSLP. Including: • Use of locally developed income survey • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) ©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Guidelines
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
NSLP Provision 2 Program •
•
LEAs in second or subsequent year of operation under P2 may use student’s base year eligibility data for students still in the district Use income survey to qualify new students enrolled as economic disadvantaged
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
If an LEA was Provision 2 or Traditional and is now CEP 1. All Economic Disadvantaged codes must be updated at the beginning of the school year – an LEA cannot rollover prior year economic disadvantage codes to the current year 2. All students on the Direct Certification (DC) listing are coded as “01”
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
If an LEA was Provision 2 or Traditional and is now CEP – cont. 3. All Students NOT on DC list must be surveyed:
• Students not on DC list who qualify as economic disadvantaged, as per income survey are coded “99” • Students not on DC list who do not qualify as per income survey are coded “00” • Students not on DC list who do not fill out income survey are coded “00”
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
If an LEA was Provision 2 or Traditional and is now CEP – cont. 4. Under CEP, an LEA can never roll the economic disadvantaged data over to the following year • Every year, the DC list can be used to code students as “01” • Every year, a new income survey must be gathered for any student not on the DC list
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Additional PEIMS Coding Guidance • Can a Provision 2 LEA use DC list for students new to the district? Yes - Use code “01” for these students • Once students are coded as “01” from DC list, they should remain “01” for the rest of the school year • LEAs can use the monthly DC list to code new enrollees at any point during the year • Income Survey can be used to code siblings in the household
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Documentation NOTE: Each student must have documentation on file reflecting the economic disadvantaged code reported in the PEIMS file For the 2014-2015 school year: Deadline for gathering the income surveys has been extended until Fall Resubmission (Jan. 2015) The coding can be retro-active to student’s enrollment date
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Pearson Pre-code File NOTE: If you are generating a Pearson (STAAR) pre-code file, LEAs must have this data entered by the date the file is generated or you will have to hand bubble the corrections on the answer sheet
LEAs can opt to use TEA’s file generated in December/January (Fall Snapshot data only)
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Stats of Sample District • DC list is approximately 60% of enrollment total • 50% of enrollment matched the DC list Issues: DC list is from last year (July 2014) Social Security number mismatches Students with State ids DC list includes seniors who graduated May 2014 DC list does not include many PK
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Number of Economically Disadvantaged Sample District Subject
2014
2015
Reading
5,692
3,319
Math
4,615
2,806
Writing
1,314
805
Science
1,993
1,196
Social Studies
1,188
736
Key Considerations for Index 3
How well do you serve economically disadvantaged students? Will index 3 be evaluated at or below the 5th percentile of campus performance? How close was each campus to the index score in 2014? Will the decrease in number of economically disadvantaged students change our campus comparable groups?
Region One ESC Assistance • Matching DC list to Student Information System data for TxEIS and iTCCS LEAs • Provide Assistance Tool to use in determining a student’s economic disadvantaged code
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
Questions • Mary Treviño-Cortez – Project Manager 956-984-6096 email:
[email protected] • Dolores Castillo 956-984-6075 email:
[email protected] • Belia Granado 956-984-6090 email:
[email protected]
©2014 Region One Education Service Center
