File - Justin Daigle, MA, BCBA, LBA
Short Description
Download File - Justin Daigle, MA, BCBA, LBA...
Description
A Deeper Understanding of Verbal Behavior
Justin Daigle, MA, BCBA, LBA Program Director
Overview
Currently, you are familiar with the concept of verbal behavior However, you have no way of systematically assessing verbalizations There are also other Verbal Operants that you have not be introduced to.
Presentation Goals
Understand basic VB concepts Learn formal definitions for Mand, Tact, Echoic, and Intraverbal Be introduced to Autoclitic, Dictation, Transcription, and Textual Learn how to assess Verbal Operants
Notes It’s important to ask “dumb” questions in this lecture. Don’t be afraid to ask me to repeat or explain deeper. Don’t be afraid to ask. No one is an expert on this, so your questions may stump me.
Basic Concepts History, Definitions, and Concepts
Skinner vs Chomsky 1969 – both published language books “No black scorpion is falling upon this table” Last of Skinner’s books
He wanted people to have a understanding of behaviorism prior to this book
Skinner vs Chomsky He knew it would be difficult to comprehend He learned not to use words that were already in use – thus his original words.
Vocal vs Verbal Verbal behavior is not vocal behavior. Language is not speech. Keep the concepts separated in your head.
ex: ASL, gestures, written, texting, email, etc.
Defining “Verbal Behavior” “Behavior mediated by another person” Very broad definition Anything else will limit something somewhere
I often say “functional language”
Speaker vs Listener Remember that in the “real world” contingencies can overlap. It is important to keep focus when analyzing verbal behavior.
Examples tend to be speaker’s behaviors.
Speaker and Listener “Hi, Jim how are you?” (Mand, not intraverbal) “I’m good” (Intraverbal… and maybe tact)
Speaker and Listener “Hi, Jim how are you?” (Mand, not intraverbal) “I’m good” (Intraverbal… and maybe tact) Stimuli
MO for social interaction
Behavior
“…”
Postcedent
“I’m good” (Sr+)
Speaker and Listener “Hi, Jim how are you?” (Mand, not intraverbal) “I’m good” (Intraverbal… and maybe tact) Stimuli
Behavior
Postcedent
MO for social interaction
“…”
“I’m good” (Sr+)
Previous statement
“…”
No fight (Sr-)
Speaker and Listener “Hi, Jim how are you?” (Mand, not intraverbal) “I’m good” (Intraverbal… and maybe tact) Overlapping Contingencies
Stimuli
Behavior
Postcedent
MO for social interaction
“…”
“I’m good” (Sr+)
Previous statement
“…”
No fight (Sr-)
Measuring Operants Unlike in grammar, we measure by words. In articulation, we measure by phonemes. In poetry, we measure by meters. In verbal
behavior, we measure by functionality.
Measuring Operants “Quickly, look a big, blue, flying bug!” Tact Mand Intraverbal Autoclitic
?
Page 534 UMO/CMO
Yes
Mand
Yes
Tact
No Non-Verbal SD
Verbal SD
No Yes
Point-to-Point Correspondence
No
Intraverbal
Yes
Echoic
Yes Formal Similarity
No
Transcription Textual
UMO and CMO Unconditioned MO – A neutral event that functions as a motivation operation. An example would be “being hungry” is an
unconditioned MO for food consumption. Conditioned MO – A neutral event that functions as a motivation operation after it has been conditioned to do so. An example would be “being poor” is a conditioned MO for money.
Point-to-Point Correspondence Point-to-Point Correspondence – When the beginning, middle, and end of a verbal stimulus matches the beginning, middle, and end of a verbal response. “C a t” Speaker: “C a t”
Formal Similarity
Formal Similarity – When a stimulus and a behavior share
the same medium (such as written to written) as well as physical resemblance. Example: Speaker: “Write the word ‘cat’”. (spoken)
Listener writes the word ‘cat’. (written) The word changed formal similarity.
Relearning the Basics Mand, Tact, Echoic & Intraverbal
Page 534 UMO/CMO
Yes
Mand
Yes
Tact
No Non-Verbal SD
Verbal SD
No Yes
Point-to-Point Correspondence
No
Intraverbal
Yes
Echoic
Yes Formal Similarity
No
Transcription Textual
A Hint
The correct definitions of the verbal operants
will always begin with…
“A verbal operant that…”
Mand Mand – A verbal operant that has a UMO/CMO and specific reinforcement Broken Down: 1) Only Verbal Operant with a MO 2) Has to have specific reinforcement
Question If a child says “candy” and you give him a candy, is it a mand?
Answer
Before you might have said “yes”.
Now you should hesitate.
Did the child have an MO for the candy?
Did the child eat the candy?
What if the child handed the candy back to you?
Manding requires an MO!
Question
A child has an MO for candy and says
“candy” and is praised for using his words. Because you need more tasks in your schedule of reinforcement, you ask the child to perform three more task, then Deliver candy. Was the child saying “candy” a mand?
Answer
No one knows…
The immediate consequence of the word was NOT the specific reinforcer
However, the specific reinforcer was delivered at the end of the schedule
because it was manded for.
Going back, what’s a better way?
Tact
Tact – A verbal operant that does not have a UMO/CMO but has a non-verbal discriminative stimulus. (This is a pure tact) Broken Down: 1) No MO 2) Non-Verbal SD
Intraverbal
Intraverbal – A verbal operant that does not have a UMO/CMO, but does have a verbal discriminative stimulus with no point-to-point correspondence. Broken Down: 1) No MO
2) Verbal SD 3) No PTP Correspondence
A Note on Intraverbals RFFC, EFFC, Fill-in-the-Blanks, etc are all technically intraverbals.
Echoics
Echoics – A verbal operant that does not have a UMO/CMO, but does have a verbal discriminative stimulus with point-to-point correspondence and formal similarity Broken Down: 1) No MO 2) Verbal SD 3) PTP Correspondence 4) Formal Similarity
Introduction to Higher Level Verbal Operants Textual, Transcription, Dictation, and Autoclitics
Textual
Textual – A verbal operant that does not have a UMO/CMO, but does have a verbal discriminative stimulus with point-to-point correspondence but does not have formal similarity Broken Down: 1) No MO 2) Verbal SD 3) PTP Correspondence 4) No Formal Similarity
Textual (What you
need to know)
Textual – When the listeners writes down what the speaker says
Keep in mind that this really doesn’t have to be written down. Textual only requires a change in formal similarity from the verbal SD.
A Note on Textual
There are two types of textual Dictation (Speaker’s Behavior) Transcription (Listener’s Behavior)
Autoclitic (Skinner’s version)
Autoclitic – Verbal Behavior about Verbal Behavior. - Anyone want to take a guess what that means in the real world?
Autoclitic (Justin’s version)
Autoclitic – Words that modify other words - Fillers (ex: “Um”, “Like”) - Structure needed for grammar and/or syntax (ex: “But”, “The”) - Modifiers such as adjectives and adverbs (ex: “Big”, “Blue”)
Questions
Use your flow chart to attempt the given exercise (worth 30 minutes if you complete).
Pay close attention to 29-35
Summary
This stuff is complex and difficult for most
You still are required to know it
The more you practice in situation – the
more clear it becomes.
View more...
Comments