HERE

January 9, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Social Science, Law, Contract Law
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download HERE...

Description

Jihan Murad, Esq.

COMPANION CLAIMS  Breach of Contract  Negligent Misrepresentation  Breach of Fiduciary Duty  Breach of Warranty

COMPANION CLAIMS YEAH – BUT WHY DOES IT MATTER?

DAMAGES

BREACH OF CONTRACT 

Arises: failure to perform obligation promised to be performed



Example: trainer fails to properly care for horse in his/her care, custody or control



Application: breach of tort based duty versus breach of a contractual based duty

NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 

Arises: a party detrimentally relies on an untrue statement made by defendant that defendant believes to be true



Example: the horse has no prior injuries



Application: in sale or lease of horse or statement about horse’s suitability for a certain type of rider

Anyone could ride this horse around the grand prix

NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 

Selleck v. Cuenca 

Plaintiffs brought action against seller, trainer and veterinarians



Alleged failure to disclose a pre-existing deep digital tendon injury and injections given 30 days prior to pre-purchase exam

FIDUCIARY DUTY 

Arises: a special trust relationship giving rise to the duty of loyalty and duty of care



Example: selection and purchase of a horse for a client



Application: mixed

AGENCY 

Arises: a fiduciary relationship when a principal agrees to have an agent act on principal's behalf



Example: agent for sale or lease of horse



Application: agent is subject to liability to a principal and/or third party harmed by agent’s tortious conduct

NO FIDUCIARY DUTY 



Welk v. Simpkins 

5 year owner/trainer relationship



Trainer injected stifles without authorization resulting in permanent damage

Pugliese v. Mondello 

Oral partnership to purchase, train and race



Trainer had authority to enter horse valued at $250,000 in a $50,000 claiming race

FIDUCIARY DUTY INFERRED 

Gussin v. Shockey 

Trainer advised inexperienced owners to purchase horses for amounts in excess of actual value without disclosing secret kickbacks



Intent to defraud inferred based on false representation of purchase price



No RICO violation

DUAL AGENCY 

Arises: representation of buyer and seller in same transaction



Example: in-barn sale of horse



Application: in many states dual agency is unlawful absent written consent 

imposition of additional duties to dual agent who has obtained written consent to act for two principals

BREACH OF WARRANTY 

Arises: generally in the context of sales, but has been raised in the context of professional services



Example: guarantee of outcome of services



Application: generally does not apply to those who provide professional services

But my trainer said he would qualify for pony finals

BREACH OF WARRANTY 

Archibald v. ACT III Arabians 

Breach of implied warranty of good and workman like performance of training program



Jury found breach of good and workmanlike training was a producing cause of death



Court entered judgment NOV – no implied warranty for services

Jihan Murad, Esq. [email protected] Arizona  California  Nevada

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF