How do we know? - Children`s University
Short Description
Download How do we know? - Children`s University...
Description
Evaluating progress and impact
John MacBeath University of Cambridge
A third space The aim of teaching is not produce learning but to provide the conditions for learning to take place (James Bradburne) Painting outside the frame (Ger Graus) ‘New skills’ – communication and teamwork (Megan and Taylor)
Having the tools to figure it out
When fleas are captured for the flea circus they are placed in jars and the lids are screwed on. When the fleas jumped in the jars, they would hit their heads on the lids. They still wanted to jump so they learned to jump just high enough so that they wouldn't hit their heads. The trainer then comes back and takes the fleas out of the jars and puts them in the circus. Even though the fleas now have the whole sky above them, they still do not jump past their now self-imposed limits. Even though the fleas are now free, they have made the limits truly theirs by refusing to go beyond them.
The definition of insanity
To go on doing the same thing and expecting different results
The peer and neighbourhood effect ‘You can take the child out of the neighborhood but much more difficult to take the neighbourhood out of the child’. ‘Neighbourhood, peer effect and its associated values are hard to eradicate, but for children and their families ‘locked in neighborhoods of corrosive, concentrated poverty expanding opportunities, enhancing social networks and peer groups are all essential aspect of substantive improvement in academic and social environments and their inter-relationship. (Smaker and Betey, 2011)
A world of learning Ten to eleven years olds:
• • •
Hours in school 900 Hours at home 1,277 Hours in the virtual world 1,934
(Baroness Susan Greenfield, 2010)
Inside the black box The effectiveness perspective
Attainment in
Attainment out
What knowledge is of most worth? We couldn’t find a mechanism to show we valued the things we didn’t test. That was the problem. We always valued the other things but we couldn’t find a way of showing it, that’s the problem. We need to get to a situation where there’s a way of showing how much we value dancing, music, sport and PE; how much we value how much improvement children make in the widest sense and that really gets into the public consciousness. (Estelle Morris, Education Minister)
NESTED LIVES Children and young people live nested lives, so that when classrooms do not function as we want them to, we go to work on improving them. Those classrooms are in schools, so when we decide that those schools are not performing appropriately, we go to work on improving them, as well. But those young people are also situated in families, in neighbourhoods, in peer groups who shape attitudes and aspirations often more powerfully than their parents or teachers. (David Berliner, 2005)
School as an anchor My thinking [was] that if you were really interested in development of the education of the child then you had to think of schools being a kind of anchor but an anchor orchestrating sets of experiences beyond school. (Sir Tim Brighouse, in Bangs, MacBeath & Galton, 2010)
Construction sites
internet
Peer group Home (s) neighbourhood
media Parents(s)
School Teacher(s) classroom
Extra curricular activities
Learning destinations
Four big questions Does the Children’s University make a difference? In what way? How do we know? What do we do about it?
Attendance
Achievement
Attitudes
Attendance 329 measures between 2007and 2010, comparing C.U. and non-C.U. pupils, On only 23 of these measures is there no difference (or a difference in favour of non-CU pupils).
Blackpool Canterbury Chesterfield Doncaster Havant Leicester Somerset` Sheffield Suffolk Sunderland Warwickshire
Term
No. pupils
Differ auth
Differ unauthor
Differ total
1 5 9 1 1 9 1 5 9 5 1 5 9 5 9 1 5 9 1 9 1 5 9 5 9
277 275 269 23 98 95 11 16 9 26 158 157 155 240 239 87 87 85 60 59 58 58 58 90 43
-1.5 -0.6 -0.9 -2.8 -1.5 -1.7 -3.3 -2.2 -2.5 -2.8 -1.7 -1.8 -1.5 -1.8 -1.4 -1.2 -2.9 -3.4 -2.0 -1.8 -0.2 -1.2 -1.1 -3.1 -2.6
-1.5 -1.8 -1.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.4 1.1 -0.3 -1.6 -0.2 -1.2 -2.1 -2.9 -0.6 -0.6 -1.3 -1.0 -1.2 -0.4 -0.6 -2.0 -1.7 -2.9 -0.4 -0.6
-3.1 -2.4 -2.3 -3.3 -2.1 -2.1 -2.2 -2.5 -4.1 -3.0 -2.9 -3.9 -4.4 -2.4 -2.1 -2.5 -3.9 -4.5 -2.4 -2.4 -2.2 -2.8 -4.0 -3.4 -2.0
KS1
No.
EST
Actual
diff
2009-10 Maths level 3+
105
19%
27%
8.0
diff by school 8.4
2009-10 Maths level
105
2.60
2.69
0.10
0,10
2009-10 Writing level 3+
105
25%
30%
5.5
5.4
2009-10 Science level
105
2.56
2.64
0.07
0.06
2009-10 Reading level 3+
105
12%
9%
-3.5%
-2.3%
2009-10 English level
854
2.46
2.55
0.09
0.08
2009-10 Maths level 2+
854
89%
92%
3.1%
3.3%
2009-10 Maths level 2B+
854
71%
77%
5.3%
4.2%
2009-10 Maths level 3+
854
17%
19%
1.4%
1.5%
2009-10 Maths level
854
2.56
2.62
0.06
0.06
2009-10 Reading 2+ level
854
84%
89%
5.1%
5.3%
2009-10 Reading L2B+
854
71%
76%
5.6%
5.2%
2009-10 Writing 3+
854
23%
26%
2.8%
2.3%
2009-10 Writing L2+
854
80%
86%
6.6%
5.5%
2009-10 Writing
854
2.56
2.62
0.06
0.06
2009-10 Writing L2B+
854
58%
65%
6.8%
4.6%
2009-10 Reading L3+
854
10%
11%
0.9%
-0.2%
2010-11 Writing 3+
124
2.52
2.64
0.12
0.16
2010-11 Maths level 2++
124
91%
97%
5.9%
6.7%
KS2
436
84%
78%
-3.7%
-2.0%
436
4.58
4.52
-0.05
0.01
2009-10 Science level 5+ 436
38%
31%
-7.0
-3.4%
2009-10 Science level
436
4.68
4.60
-0.08
-0.02%
2009-10 English level
1031
4.43
4.48
0.01
0.05
2009-10 Maths 2 level progress 2009-10 Maths level4 +
1031
82%
83%
2.6%
3.2%
1031
79%
83%
3.2%
3.2%
2009-10 Maths level5 +
1031
30%
33%
2.6%
2.2%
2009-10 Maths level
1031
4.49
4.60
0.06
0.06
2009-10 English 2 levels progress 2009-10 English level
KS3
2009-10 Eng&Maths 5+
50
57%
70%
10.7%
8.6%
2009-10 Eng&Maths 6+
50
22%
28%
9.4%
9.6%
2009-10 English level progress 2009-10 English level 5
50
31%
42%
15.5%
12.1%
50
68%
78%
8.2%
8.8%
2009-10 English level 6+
50
26%
36%
13.6%
11.1%
2009-10 English level
50
5.28
5.58
0.33
0.28
2009-10 Maths 2 levels progress 2009-10 Maths level 5+
50
42%
58%
18.8%
18.6%
50
68%
76%
7.2%
3.7%
2009-10 Maths level 6+
50
37%
50%
11.6%
14.1%
2009-10 Maths level
50
5.48
5.85
0.35
0.29
2009-10
Science level 5+
50
67%
80%
12%
12.2%
2009-10
Science level 6+
50
28%
40%
16.1%
17.2%
2009-10
Science level
50
5.32
5.68
0.38
0.40
2009-10
373
64%
69%
5.3%
5.8%
373
29%
28%
373
29%
39%
11.5%
11.7%
2009-10
English & Maths Level 5+ English & Maths level 6+ English 2 levels progress English level 5+
373
72%
79%
8.7%
6.9%
2009-10
English level 6+
373
33%
37%
5.5%
4.8%
2009-10
English level
373
5.46
5.59
0.17
0.15
2009-10
373
52%
51%
0.9%
2,5%
2009-10
Maths level 2 progress Maths level 5+
373
74%
76%
3.0
2.9
2009-10
Maths level 6+
373
48%
46%
-2.4
-1.9
2009-10
Maths level
373
5.76
5.77
0.02
0.04
2009-10
Science level 5+
373
74%
78%
5.4
2.2
2009-10
Science level 6+
373
37%
44%
8.1%
5.3%
2009-10
Science level
373
5.57
5.66
0.13
0.04
2009-10 2009-10
-0.2%
0.6%
Data is for dialogue Professional accountability is based on data, not as a final judgment but as part of the toolkit for understanding current performance and formulating plans for reasonable action…. not as a static numerical accounting but as a conversation, using data to stimulate discussion, challenge ideas, rethink directions, and monitor progress, providing an ongoing image of [learning] as it changes, progresses, stalls, regroups, and moves forward again. (Earl and Katz, 2006: 13).
“Numbers are like people. Torture them enough and they will tell you anything” (Stephen Gorard)
Case stories Interviews Focus groups Observation and participation Travellers’ tales Partners , patrons and products
CONNECT
What do I already know or can do?
EXTEND
How does this extend my knowledge or skill?
CHALLENGE
How does this challenge my knowledge or skill?
Curriculum and assessment
Beyond curriculum and Assessment smart
What are the connections? Who makes them? How are they made? How do we know?
View more...
Comments