MEDIA SELF-REGULATION IN THE NETHERLANDS

January 9, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Arts & Humanities, Writing, Journalism
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download MEDIA SELF-REGULATION IN THE NETHERLANDS...

Description

MEDIA SELF-REGULATION IN THE NETHERLANDS The Netherlands Press Council Daphne Koene secretary SMF Project Serbia Amsterdam 11 November 2014

Why self-regulation? • • • • • •

freedom of expression and information fundamental human right cornerstone of democracy ‘public watchdog’ media accountability state-regulation vs self-regulation

History NPC • 1948

Raad van Tucht » disciplinary council » practice of union members

• 1960

Raad voor de Journalistiek » council of opinion » practice of all journalists

Establishment & financing Foundation - Stichting Raad voor de Journalistiek •

Netherlands Union of Journalists



Netherlands Society of Chief-editors



Co-ordinating organizations of printed press and multimedia news companies



Co-ordinating organizations of public broadcasting



Commercial broadcasting

Mission Article 3 of Statutes: Examination of complaints against violations of good journalistic practice • • • • •

complainant directly involved journalistic practice specific editorial content (all media) ‘watchdog without teeth’? moral redress

Composition Press Council • Chairman high profile journalist

• Vice-chairmen judiciary

• Journalist-members reporters/editors editors-in-chief

• Non journalist-members experts public members

Considering complaints in chambers

Procedure • • • • • •

complaint in writing / online no charge legal representation permitted public hearing consideration behind closed doors decision within 8 weeks

Recent developments - 1 March 2013: • Chairman is high profile journalist (no longer a lawyer), with important representing role. November 2013: • Transformation into a ‘secondary body’:  obligation to file complain to journalist/editor-in-chief first;  accelerated procedure and mediation abolished.

Recent developments - 2 November 2013 • Council withholds opinion in complaints addressed to media/journalists who basicly do not co-operate, unless case is of a higher/general importance. • Reducing ‘judicial’ appearance by simplifying decisions. Late-2014 • Guidelines will be revised in consultation with the journalistic field.

Alliance of Independent Press Councils of Europe • Annual meeting • 2015 in Vienna • info: Alexander Warzilek ([email protected])

• • • •

Exchange of views and information Remarkable differences No ‘one-fits-all’ model www.aipce.net

Thank you for the attention! [email protected] www.rvdj.nl [email protected] @RVDJ_NL

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF