Raising Your Technical Debt Ceiling…Or Not?

January 17, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Science, Health Science, Pediatrics
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Raising Your Technical Debt Ceiling…Or Not?...

Description

“Raising Your Technical Debt Ceiling

Or NOT”

CQAA Webcast December 6, 2011

Michael Mah Managing Partner QSM Associates, Inc. 75 South Church Street Pittsfield, MA 01201 413-499-0988 Fax 413-447-7322 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.qsma.com Blog: www.optimalfriction.com

Rayleigh Curve Defect Rate

(#2)

Rayleigh Curve Defect Rate

Defect Discovery Rate

Discovered Defects per reporting period at time t

Area under the curve is equal to the Total Discovered Defects on the project

Elapsed Calendar Time

(#3)

t

Defects and Sources of Technical Debt

(#4)

Defects and Sources of Technical Debt

(#5)

Defects and Sources of Technical Debt

(#6)

Case Study #1

(#7)

Case Study #1

(#8)

Case Study #1

(#9)

Project Sketch – Core Metrics

(#10)

Trendline Assessment – Defects/Quality Defects During Test 10,000

1,000

Errors (SysInt-Del)

Rel 8.0

Rel 6.0 Rel 7.5

Rel 6.5

Rel 7.0

Rel 5.0

100

Far Fewer Defects: 50% - 66% Below Industry 10 1,000

100

Effective SLOC (thousands)

Business Sy stems Av g. Line Sty le

(#11)

Av ionic Sy stems 1 Sigma Line Sty le

Command & Control

Microcode Sy stems

Process Control

QSM 2005 Business

Trendline Assessment – Build Phase Schedule Main Build Phase Duration vs Size 100

Rel 6.5

Rel 5.0

Rel 6.0

Time (Months)

10

Rel 8.0

Rel 7.0 Rel 7.5

Schedules are Half Industry 1 1,000

100

Effective SLOC (thousands)

Business Sy stems Av g. Line Sty le

(#12)

Av ionic Sy stems 1 Sigma Line Sty le

Command & Control

Microcode Sy stems

Process Control

QSM 2005 Business

Follett vs. Industry Average

(#13)

Industry Average

Current Performance

Delta

Project Cost

$3.5 Million

$2.2 Million

-$1.3M

Schedule

12.6 months

7.8 months

-4.8 mos

QA Defects

242

121

-50%

Staffing

35

35

n/a

Case Study #2

(#14)

(#15)

(#16)

(#17)

(#18)

(#19)

Benchmark Assessment — Staffing Average Staff

1,000

Smaller Teams

100

Headcount 10

1

10

1 1,000

100

New + Modified Size (thousands)

(#20)

All Systems

Special Project

QSM 2008 Business

Avg. Line Style

1 Sigma Line Style

Benchmark Assessment — Schedule Time-to-Market

100

Faster Schedules

1

10

1 1,000

100

New + Modified Size (thousands)

(#21)

All Systems

Special Project

QSM 2008 Business

Avg. Line Style

1 Sigma Line Style

Months

10

Benchmark Assessment – Quality Bugs During QA

10,000

Fewer Defects 1,000

10

1

10

1 1,000

100

New + Modified Size (thousands)

(#22)

All Systems

Special Project

QSM 2008 Business

Avg. Line Style

1 Sigma Line Style

Defects

100

Monstrous Technical Debt Project

(#23)

Monstrous Technical Debt Project

INCEP ELAB CONST TRANS

Avg Staff (people) 0

1

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

120

100

80

40

20

0 Apr '03

(#24)

1 Jun

3 Aug

5 Oct

7 Dec

9 Feb '04

11 Apr

13 Jun

15 Aug

17 Oct

19 Dec

21 Feb '05

Avg Staff (people)

60

Monstrous Technical Debt Project Gantt Chart By Sub-Phase 0

2

3

5

6

7 10

11

Inception

Elaboration 1

Elaboration 2

Elaboration 3

Construction 1 - Pre-FIT

Sub-Phases

Construction 2 - FIT

Construction 3 - UAT 1

Construction 4 - UAT 2

Construction 5 - Prod DataLoad

Production Pilot

Post Production

(#25)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep '03 '04

Defects vs. Industry Average Defects Found 0

1

3

4

5

5

6

6

78

9

7 8

9

10

10 350

300

250

200

Defects 150

100

50

0 05/17 '03

(#26)

6 06/28

12 08/09

Current Plan

18 09/20

24 11/01

30 12/13

Actuals

36 01/24 '04

42 03/06

48 04/17

54 05/29

Green Control Bound

60 07/10

66 08/21

72 10/02

78 11/13

Yellow Control Bound

84 12/25

90 02/05 '05

Project: CEP

Forecast to Complete (4 Month Delay) Nov 19

(#27)

Comparison to Industry Average

(#28)

Industry Average

Offshore Average

Delta

Project Cost

$3.5 Million

$3.2 Million

-$0.3M

Schedule

12.6 months

9.6 months

-3.0 mos

QA Defects

242

677

+280%

Staffing

35

50

+15

* Normalized to same project size

Some Practical Advice (#29)

Build a Little Less

(#30)

Take a Little More Time

(#31)

Get Smart People

(#32)

Use Small A-Teams

(#33)

Give Them the Best Tools

(#34)

(#35)

(#36)

(#37)

(#38)

(#39)

(#40)

(#41)

(#42)

(#43)

(#44)

www.qsma.com

(#45)

SLIMEstimate: Size, Schedule, Cost & Quality Estimating

SLIMMasterPlan: Incremental Development & Project SLIM-Control: Aggregation Variance Analysis & Adaptive Forecasting

SLIM-Metrics: Industry Benchmarking & Process Improvement

SLIM-DataManager Software Project Metrics Repository (#48)

footer

For Additional Information

Michael Mah email: [email protected] website: www.qsma.com blog: www.optimalfriction.com twitter: @michaelcmah Tel: 1 413-499-0988

(#49)

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF