Smart Motor Management

January 13, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Engineering & Technology, Electrical Engineering
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Smart Motor Management...

Description

s

Smart Motor Management How data-driven visibility can help protect both processes and motors in key industrial applications

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance “Wait ‘til it trips” Item Item Item

Traditional motor control circuits use thermal, or electronic, overload relays to protect electric motors from the effects of heat generated from mechanical or electrical overload conditions.

Item Item Item Item

When the overload trips …. what happens to the process??

Item

Item Item

page 2

When the overload relay detects an overload condition of sufficient magnitude and duration, a normally closed contact on the overload relay opens, turning the protected motor off.

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance “Wait ‘til it trips” Item Item Item Item Item Item

When the overload trips …. • Was it caused by a mechanical load problem? (bearing, poor maintenance, etc.) • Was it caused by a motor problem? • Was it caused by an electrical power problem?

Item Item

Item Item

page 3

• What was happening when the motor tripped?

What needs to be corrected to restore the process?

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance “Wait ‘til it trips” Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

A tripped overload relay causes: • Unexpected shut downs • Unidentified reason for the trip • Potentially hazardous conditions

• Potential scrapped material

Item Item

page 4

• Potential lost production

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Time Based or Preventive Maintenance Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 5

Time based maintenance does not “wait ‘til it trips”. It is: • based on a presumed schedule, much like the maintenance schedule for a car. • often scheduled around planned shut downs. • can lead to unnecessary maintenance.

• not able to identify parts that are nearing the end of their service life.

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance “Wait ‘til it trips” or Preventive Maintenance Item Item

Traditional motor maintenance relies on traditional motor protection devices.

Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 6

Thermal overloads (bimetallic) and basic electronic overloads (ESP200) provide limited protective functions. The additional protective functions on ESP200 do not annunciate the reason for the trip.

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance “Wait ‘til it trips” or Preventive Maintenance Item Item Item Item Item

Traditional motor maintenance • Relies on traditional motor load protective devices. • Offers little help in troubleshooting the cause of the trip.

Item Item Item

• Does little to prevent unwanted shut downs caused by dynamic changes to the protected loads.

Item Item

page 7

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item

Condition based, or Predictive Maintenance is based on historical load information, such as:

Item Item Item Item Item

Item

• Operating hours • Number of starts • Number of trips

• Load data ($$$)

Item

page 8

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item

Condition based, or Predictive Maintenance requires gathering information. But how?

Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 9

Traditional devices only indicate the present condition of the connected load.

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item

Condition Based, or Predictive Maintenance requires that operating information for the connected load be gathered and stored to identify conditions that require maintenance. More information leads to more effective predictive maintenance.

Item

page 10

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item

Intelligent, communicating overload devices offer a wide range of selectable protective functions. Siemens SIMOCODE pro Motor Management device can provide all of the functions listed below.

Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 11

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Enhanced capabilities allow the user to: • tailor protective functions to the load. • get warnings of developing problems before a trip occurs. • gather dynamic load information.

Item

Item Item

• select the response of the protective device. • know why the device tripped.

page 12

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item Item

SIMOCODE pro C V Current Current Voltage Power Power Factor

(Motor Overload) Inputs

Local Logic

I/O Expansion

Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 13

PROFIBUS

Outputs

Digital Analog Temperature Ground Fault

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item

SIMOCODE pro V in a typical tiastar™ unit

Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 14

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item

SIMOCODE pro Standard Protective Functions

Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 15

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item

SIMOCODE pro Standard Protective Functions

Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 16

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item

SIMOCODE pro Optional Protective Functions – Voltage Based

Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 17

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item

SIMOCODE pro Optional Protective Functions – Analog

Item Item Item Item Item Item Item

Item Item

page 18

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item

SIMOCODE pro

Available Data Number of Overload Trips

Individual Event Messages (62)

Number of Parameterizations

Individual Warning Messages (33)

Motor Stop Time

Individual Trip Messages (48)

Operating Hours

Motor Current (%FLA)

Item

Device Operating Hours

Motor Voltage

Item

Number of Starts

Motor Power (W & VA)

Number of Starts Left

Power Factor (COS Phi)

Number of Starts Right

Time to Trip

Consumed Energy (kWh)

Cool Down Period

Individual Status Messages (29)

Last Trip Current

Item Item

Item Item

Item Item

page 19

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

Smart Motor Management vs. Traditional Maintenance Condition Based (Predictive) Maintenance. Item Item Item Item

There are significant benefits from employing a Condition Based Predictive motor maintenance program: • Smart motor management provides real time, dynamic motor and load

Item

data to facilitate Predictive motor and load maintenance.

Item

• Smart motor management includes enhanced monitoring and protective functions.

Item Item

Item Item

• Smart motor management allows selected responses to monitored motor or load conditions. • Smart motor management can alert the user to an impending problem and prevent unwanted shutdowns. •Smart motor management alerts the user as to the cause of a trip or warning, simplifying maintenance.

page 20

© Siemens Industry, Inc. 2011

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF