DATA Overview ITEC 7305

Data Overview ITEC 7305 Fickett ES 2012-2014 CRCT 3rd Grade Mathematics Submitted by Ruben Barkley

Purpose of Presentation The purpose of this data overview is to provide a concise summary of the student achievement results for 3rd grade students, over a 3 year period, in the content area of mathematics at Fickett Elementary School (FES). As part of this data overview, I will closely examine the 2012-2013 CRCT mathematics scores of the 3rd grade students and I will highlight strengths, as well as weaknesses, and emphasize one or two key areas in which academic improvement is needed most. In addition, I will use pie charts, bar charts and line graphs to visually display the data trends.

rd 3

District Grade Proficiency Over Time 90% 84% 80%

70%

71% 68% 65%

85%

85%

79% 75%

78% 74%

66%

69% 63%

60%

Reading

50%

ELA 40%

Math

30%

20%

10%

0% 2012

2013

2014

District 3rd Grade Proficiency Over Time (Details) District Percent Proficient Over 3 Years

2012

2013

Reading

84%

85%

85%

ELA

84%

79%

78%

Math

68%

66%

69%

Science

65%

66%

63%

Social Studies

71%

75%

74%

Percentages reflect those students performing at or above proficiency (2014 reflects preliminary data)

2014

2011-2012

rd 3

Number Tested

Grade

School Year

Subject

Does Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

2011-12

English Language Arts

98

17%

53%

30%

Mathematics

97

36%

38%

26%

Reading

98

12%

57%

31%

Science

100

35%

38%

27%

Social Studies

100

21%

45%

34%

2012-2013

rd 3

Number Tested

Grade

School Year

Subject

Does Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

2012-13

English Language Arts

87

33%

47%

20%

Mathematics

86

42%

37%

21%

Reading

87

17%

54%

29%

Science

89

38%

44%

18%

Social Studies

89

28%

49%

22%

rd 3

2013-2014

Grade

3RD GRADE - CRCT 2014 Level 1

Level 2 & 3

39%

46% 64%

67%

81%

61%

54% 36%

33%

19% READING

ELA

MATH

SCIENCE

S.STUDIES

3rd Grade Reading

Preiminary Data

ELA

Math

Science

S.Studies

Level 1

19

33

61

54

36

Level 2 & 3

81

67

39

46

64

2011-12 ( 3rd Grade Gender Comparison) Males

Females

2011-2012 Gender Comparison (Details) School Year

Gender

Subject

2011-12

Female

English Language Arts

49

20%

53%

27%

Mathematics

48

42%

35%

23%

Reading

49

12%

59%

29%

Science

51

43%

37%

20%

Social Studies

51

27%

47%

25%

English Language Arts

49

14%

53%

33%

Mathematics

49

31%

41%

29%

Reading

49

12%

55%

33%

Science

49

27%

39%

35%

Social Studies

49

14%

43%

43%

English Language Arts

46

17%

61%

22%

Mathematics

45

33%

42%

24%

Reading

46

9%

54%

37%

Science

46

24%

57%

20%

Social Studies

46

22%

50%

28%

English Language Arts

41

51%

32%

17%

Mathematics

41

51%

32%

17%

Reading

41

27%

54%

20%

Science

43

53%

30%

16%

Social Studies

43

35%

49%

16%

Male

2012-13

Female

Male

Number Tested

Does Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

2012-2013 (Gender Comparison) Male

Female

2012-2013 Gender Comparison (Details) School Year

Gender

Subject

2011-12

Female

English Language Arts

49

20%

53%

27%

Mathematics

48

42%

35%

23%

Reading

49

12%

59%

29%

Science

51

43%

37%

20%

Social Studies

51

27%

47%

25%

English Language Arts

49

14%

53%

33%

Mathematics

49

31%

41%

29%

Reading

49

12%

55%

33%

Science

49

27%

39%

35%

Social Studies

49

14%

43%

43%

English Language Arts

46

17%

61%

22%

Mathematics

45

33%

42%

24%

Reading

46

9%

54%

37%

Science

46

24%

57%

20%

Social Studies

46

22%

50%

28%

English Language Arts

41

51%

32%

17%

Mathematics

41

51%

32%

17%

Reading

41

27%

54%

20%

Science

43

53%

30%

16%

Social Studies

43

35%

49%

16%

Male

2012-13

Female

Male

Number Tested

Does Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

2011-2012 (3rd Grade Economic Status Comparison) Economically Disadvantaged

Non-Economically Disadvantaged

2012-2013 (3rd Grade Economic Status Comparison) Economically Disadvantaged

Non-Economically Disadvantaged

2011-2012 (Economic Status Comparison) Details School Year

Economic Status

Subject

2011-12

Economically Disadvantaged

English Language Arts

78

17%

56%

27%

Mathematics

78

37%

40%

23%

Reading

78

13%

55%

32%

Science

80

36%

40%

24%

Social Studies

80

23%

44%

34%

English Language Arts

20

20%

40%

40%

Mathematics

19

32%

32%

37%

Reading

20

10%

65%

25%

Science

20

30%

30%

40%

Social Studies

20

15%

50%

35%

English Language Arts

76

36%

49%

16%

Mathematics

75

45%

36%

19%

Reading

76

20%

57%

24%

Science

78

40%

42%

18%

Social Studies

78

29%

51%

19%

English Language Arts

11

18%

36%

45%

Mathematics

11

18%

45%

36%

Reading

11

36%

64%

Science

11

27%

55%

18%

Social Studies

11

18%

36%

45%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

2012-13

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Number Tested

Does Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

2012-2013 Fickett 3rd Grade Domain Data (Teacher Comparison) 51% 63% 51%

Algebra

69% 84% 64% 58% 66% 64% 63%

Geometry

Teacher 6 79%

Teacher 5

72%

Teacher 4 43%

Teacher 3

64%

Teacher 2

49%

Measurement and Data Analysis

68%

Teacher 1

73% 61% 41% 63% 37%

Numbers and Operation

61% 73% 70% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2012-2013 Percentage of 3rd Grade Students At/Above Proficiency in Mathematics

65%

59% Numbers & Operations Measurement and Data Anaylsis Geometry Algebra

60% 67% Total Number of students tested: 86 (45 Females, 41 Males)

Summary • On the 2012-2013 CRCT, the 3rd Grade students at Fickett ES performed the weakest in the Numbers & Operations domain on the mathematics portion of the assessment. • The inconsistency of the percentage of students at or above proficiency on the 2012-2013 CRCT, as displayed in the Domain Data comparison of teachers, suggests that there is a lack of shared and collaborative planning among the 3rd Grade teachers. • In comparing the 3rd Grade students at or above proficiency in mathematics based on gender, the females out-performed the males by 17% (Females = 66% at/above proficiency, Males = 49% at/above proficiency) on the 2012-2013 CRCT.