Leigh Ann Smith - the North Carolina Housing Coalition!

January 8, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Business, Finance, Investing
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Leigh Ann Smith - the North Carolina Housing Coalition!...

Description

Integrating New Markets and Historic Tax Credits North Carolina Affordable Housing Conference

September 16, 2010

Fundamentals of Federal Historic Tax Credits

• HTC program has been in existence over 20 years. • Provides dollar for dollar federal income tax credit for rehabilitation of historic income producing properties (commercial, industrial, agricultural, or residential rental). • National Park Service and State Historic Preservation Officer approve and monitor (i) qualification of building for HTC and (ii) development of and compliance with plans and specs for rehabilitation to ensure historic character is maintained. • HTC is equal to 20% of “qualified rehabilitation expenditures.” Qualified rehabilitation expenditures must exceed the acquisition costs of the “Historic Building.”

• HTC is not competitive, but National Park Service must certify that building qualifies for credit and that rehabilitation was completed in accordance with approved plans and specs. 2

Fundamentals of Federal Historic Tax Credits (cont.)

• Building must be listed on the National Registry of Historic Places or be located in and add to the significance of a registered historic district. • HTC is taken all at one time when the project is placed in service.

• Subject to recapture for 5 years. • Less technical than LIHTC, but requires substantial interaction with National Park Service on Plans and Specs. • As with LIHTCs, some states have state HTC programs, many of which “piggyback” on Federal HTC programs. • Allocation of HTCs among partners follows profits.

3

Historic Tax Credit Project – Single Tier Structure Diagram General Partner

Developer

Cash

Property Owner

Lender(s)

99.99% Interest (including 99.99% of HTCs Profits and Losses)

Investor

• Property must be located in a qualifying area or be listed on National Register of Historic Places. (Part 1) • Developer/GP work with National Park Service on satisfactory plans and specs for qualified rehabilitation of Historic Building. (Part 2) • HTC based on 20% of qualified rehabilitation expenditures. • HTC claimed on date project is placed in service. • No significant future monitoring by National Park Service after building receives certification that rehabilitation was completed in accordance with agreed upon plans and specs. (Part 3) • Five year compliance period during which Property Owner must remain owner of property and Investor must remain partner in Property Owner in order to avoid recapture. • Tax basis in historic building is reduced by amount of HTC.

4

Historic Tax Credit Project – Lease Pass-Through Structure Diagram General Partner

Developer

Cash & .01% Interest Services

Property Owner / Landlord Lender(s)

Cash Rent

Master Tenant

Master Lease & “Pass-Through” of HTCs

99.99% Interest (including 99.99% of HTCs, Profits and Losses)

Investor

Rent

Sub Tenants

• Substantially similar to single tier structure on technical points, with addition of Master Lease and Master Tenant between Investor and Property Owner. • HTCs are allowed to be passed through to Master Tenant upon Property Owner/Landlord and Master Tenant making valid Pass-Through Election. • Important to maintain integrity of Master Lease. • No reduction in tax basis of historic building, instead Master Tenant must include HTC amount in annual income pro rata over term of lease. 5

Historic Tax Credit Project Structures Comparing Advantages and Disadvantages Single Tier Advantages

Lease Pass-Through

– Simplicity – fewer entities, fewer documents required

– No mandatory basis reduction in property or HTC Investor’s partnership interest – GP receives higher tax basis and depreciation with respect to property – Minimizes HTC Investor’s participation in property owner’s cash flow

Disadvantages

– Investor has potential to receive higher distributions of cash flow and losses

– More complex, leading to higher transaction costs and higher on-going administrative costs

– Mandatory basis reduction of depreciable property and HTC Investor’s basis in partnership interest

– Master Tenant recognizes income in amount of HTC via amortization over term of Master Lease (Note: this result may be attractive to some Investors)

6

Diagram of Combined LIHTC and HTC Project with Lease Pass-Through Structure Cash .01% Interest

General Partner

Developer Property Owner/ Landlord

10% Interest

Cash Cash Master Lease and PassThrough of HTCs

LIHTC Investor

Rent

Master Tenant

Cash (99.99% Interest Including 99.99% of HTCs)

Lenders

7

HTC Investor

Combined LIHTC and HTC Project with Lease Pass-Through Structure

Comments • LIHTC Investor holds 89.99% limited partner interest in Property Owner receiving 99.99% special allocation of depreciation on property. • Lease Pass-Through Structure avoids reduction in basis of property and accordingly no reduction in LIHTC. • Can dismantle HTC Structure at end of 5 year HTC compliance period.

• Can have different investors for LIHTCs and HTCs.

8

Fundamentals of New Market Tax Credits

• NMTC program has been in existence for almost 10 years. • Provides dollar for dollar federal income tax credit for investments in community development entities (“CDEs”) that use substantially all the invested funds to make investments in qualifying low-income community businesses (“QALICBs”). • QALICBs must be located in low-income communities designated by census tract. Certain businesses are excluded (e.g. residential rental activities, golf courses, country clubs, horse tracks and other gambling businesses, massage parlors, stores where principal business is sale of alcohol for consumption off-premises). • The U.S. Treasury through the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (“CDFI”) allocates to CDEs the dollar amounts on which NMTC can be claimed through highly competitive process.

9

Fundamentals of New Market Tax Credits (cont.)

• CDEs are domestic corporations, limited liability companies or partnerships certified by the CDFI. They must demonstrate a primary mission of servicing or providing investment capital for low-income communities and maintain accountability to residents of low-income communities (representation on governing or advisory boards). • CDE must invest substantially all of the QEI in QALICBs through “Qualified Low-Income Community Investments” (“QLICIs”). Can be debt or equity (but not a “grant”). QLICIs must stay “invested” during 7 year compliance period to avoid recapture. • NMTC = 39% of QEI taken over 7 years (5% first 3 years and 6% last 4 years). • Requirements for qualification as QEI, CDE, QLICI and QALICB are very technical with primary burden on CDE.

10

Sample Structure New Markets Tax Credit Structure • QEI triggers credit delivery period. Total NMTC = 39% of QEI delivered over 7 years.

Investor

$10M

Qualified Equity Investment (QEI)

100% Interest in CDE, NMTCs, Profits, Losses and Cash Flow

Community Development Entity (CDE)

Loan A $7M

Loan B $3M

Qualified Low Income Community Business (QALICB)

• Loan A = Qualified Low Income Community Investment (QLICI) based on market rate interest. Interest-only with balloon payment at end of 7 year compliance period. • Loan B = Also a QLICI. Typically has below market interest rate (e.g. 2%) and, provided all other requirements are met (e.g. debt service on Loan A and Loan B paid, no violations of NMTC requirements by QALICB), final payment generally reduced to fraction of principal outstanding (but QLICI must be characterized as “bona fide debt” versus a “grant”).

11

The Tax Credit Marketplace

Federal

North Carolina

South Carolina

Low Income

Yes

Refundable

No

Historic / Mill

Yes

Yes

Yes

New Markets

Yes

No

Yes

Renewable Energy

Yes

Yes

Yes

Brownfields

No

Yes

Yes

12

Which Credits Work Well Together?  Low Income and Historic

 Low Income and Renewable Energy  New Markets and Historic  New Markets and Renewable Energy

13

HTC Funding

HTC Investor Managing Member:

NTCIC Investment Fund X, LLC

NOLA Manager, LLC HTC

Project Lender Local/Regional Bank

Lessor (Landlord) NOLA Operating Co., LLC 89% Man. Member: NOLA Mgr, LLC 10% Member: NOLA Operating Co., LLC 1% Member: State HTC Investor, LLC

HTC Equity

Master Lease HTC Lease Payment

Master Tenant NOLA Operating Co., LLC 99.99% Man. Member: NTCIC IFX, LLC .01% Member: NOLA Manager, LLC

HTC Equity

State HTC Investor LA State Credit Fund

Developer

Tenants

HTC & NMTC Funding Equity

Leveraged Lender Local/Regional Bank

Repay SHTC Bridge Loan

Equity Bridge Loans

Constr./Perm Loans

NOLA Investment Fund, LLC

NMTC NMTC Equity

HTC & NMTC Investor NTCIC Investment Fund X, LLC

100% Member: NTCIC IFX, LLC

LA State Credit Fund

QEI

SHTC

NMTC

QEI

HTC

NMTC

NTCIC Sub-CDE

Second Sub-CDE

NTCIC Investment Fund X, LLC

NOLA Investment Fund III, LLC

QLICI 1 SHTC Equity

Managing Member:

Repay HTC Bridge Loan

Project Investment Fund

State HTC Investor

Affiliated Developer Entity

QLICI 2

Lessor (Landlord) NOLA Operating Co., LLC 89% Man. Member: NOLA Mgr, LLC 10% Member: NOLA Operating Co., LLC 1% Member: State HTC Investor, LLC

HTC Equity Master Lease HTC Lease Payment

Master Tenant NOLA Operating Co., LLC 100% Member: NTCIC IFX, LLC

HTC Equity

NOLA Manager, LLC

Developer

Tenants

Combining The Tax Credits Federal Historic Tax Credits: Total Qualified Costs:

QREs Tax Credit Percentage Federal Credits Federal Credit Price Total Equity to Developer

$12 M 20% $2.4 M $1.00 $2.4 M

Combining The Tax Credits New Markets Tax Credits: NTCIC CDE Allocation

$ 11 M

2nd CDE Allocation

$

Total QEI

$ 16 M

Tax Credit Percentage New Markets Credits New Markets Credit Price NMTC Equity to Project

5M

39% $6.24 M $.70 $4.37 M

Combining The Tax Credits

Total Tax Credit Investment: Federal Equity

$2.40 M

NMTC Equity

$4.37 M

TOTAL EQUITY

$6.77 M

What Makes a Project Attractive to Investors

• Tell a good story – Project Economics (low loan-to-value, strong debt service coverage ratios, pre-leasing) • Minimize risk of something going wrong

– High level of Community Impact • Job creation

• Grocery or other services

– Developer Experience • Market (CRA)

Issues for Lenders with NMTC • Lack of direct security interest • Forbearance • 7 years, interest-only • Limited reserve accruals

Sponsor as Leveraged Lender • Sponsor receives grants, pledges or other funds and loans them through the new markets structure • Caveats – Understand the restrictions on the money being enhanced • Some grants only fund on a % of completion basis, • Some grants/loans need to be secured by mortgage on property (AHP)

– Labor Intensive for Sponsor • Set up new entity to act as QALICB • Annual reporting requirements • Need to have cash at closing for leveraged loan

INVESTOR

NMTC Equity $

SPONSOR Leveraged Lender (LL)

2,925,000

$

7,075,000 NMTC Leveraged Loan

Total $ 10,000,000

Investment Fund 100%IM

QEI $ 10,000,000

NMTC $

CDE

QLICI Loan $ 7,075,000 Equity $ 2,925,000 Total $ 10,000,000

TBD LLC QALICB

Rent payments via operating lease

SPONSOR (operating entity)

3,900,000

Legislative Update & Current Bills • Codification of Economic Substance – impact on Tax Credit Transactions

• HR 4213 – Extend LIHTC 1602 for 9%, extend NMTC program, extend GO Zone Deadlines for LIHTC and GO Zone HTC

• S 3326 –

5 year carry-back provision for LIHTC investments, extend 1602 for a year and expand 1602 to 4% credits

• HR 2628 / S 1583 – Multi-year extension of NMTC program, increase the annual funding and exempt NMTC from AMT

• HR 3715 / S 1743 – Several enhancements to the HTC program

• HR 2336 – Energy retrofits for real estate owners

• HR 4868 – Affordable Housing preservation bill

Contact Information

Robert L. Mendenhall 704.444.3520

Marshall Phillips 704.295.9394

[email protected]

[email protected]

Kirk Carrison

Leigh Ann Smith

919.688.5600

980.386.3855

[email protected]

[email protected]

View more...

Comments

Copyright � 2017 NANOPDF Inc.
SUPPORT NANOPDF