Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations Jakki J. Mohr
Short Description
Download Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations Jakki J. Mohr...
Description
Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations
Chapter 3: Relationship Marketing: Partnerships and Alliances
Chapter Outline
Partnerships
Types of Partnerships Reasons to Partner Risks in Partnering Keys to Success
Relationship Marketing
Customer Equity Customer Acquisition Customer Retention © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Types of Partnerships Complementors
Suppliers
Focal Firm
Distribution
Competitors
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Customers
Types of Partnerships (cont.)
Vertical partnerships: with members at other levels of the supply chain
Suppliers Distribution channel members Customers
Horizontal partnerships: with members at the same level of the supply chain
“Complementors:” makers of jointly-used products Competitors—”competition” © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Antitrust Laws Related to Competitive Collaboration
National Cooperative Research Act (1984)
Eased traditional antitrust laws to allow competitors to form relationships to jointly pursue research and development projects.
National Cooperative Production Amendment (1993)
Expanded the 1984 Act to allow joint
production
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Example of Competitive Collaboration: Sematech
The semiconductor manufacturing technology consortium of US semiconductor manufacturers and the US government http://www.sematech.org/
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Reasons to Partner
Access resources and skills Gain cost efficiencies Speed time-to-market Access new markets Define industry standards Develop innovations and new products Develop complementary products Gain market clout © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
The Product Life Cycle, Innovation, and the Role of Alliances High
Product Innovation
Rate of Major Innovation
Process Innovation Low
Stage of Product Life Cycle Emergence Growth
Maturity
Decline
Alliance Types Standards Licensing Technology
Licensing R&D Marketing
Manufacturing Attacker Marketing Incumbent Process R&D
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Risks in Partnering
Outright failure of relationships Loss of autonomy and control Loss of proprietary information to partner Potential legal issues and antitrust problems Failure to achieve alliance objectives
Residual allocation when success Responsibility delineation when failure © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Factors Contributing to Partnership Success
Joint (bilateral) interdependence
Caution warranted with partners of unequal size
Governance Structure (next slide) Joint Commitment (credible, safeguarding) Trust in the partner’s motives and intents Effective Communication Compatible Corporate Cultures Integrative conflict resolution and negotiation win/lose bargaining)
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
(vs. “hard,”
Factors Contributing to Partnership Success (Cont.)
Effective structure to govern the alliance
Unilateral: one party has authority to make decisions Bilateral: governance based on mutual expectations regarding behaviors and activities
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
More on Governance
Match type of governance to degree of risk:
High risk (arising from uncertainty or investments dedicated to the relationship) warrants either:
Escape clause
“Credible commitments” and safeguards that
create mutual dependence -orNarrow terms and conditions that keep the firms only loosely-coupled Bilateral governance based on commitment, trust, and communication © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Relationship Marketing
“The formation of long-term relationships with customers and other business partners, which yield mutually-satisfying, win/win results.”
Why relied upon so heavily?
Time to market cycle is short Development costs/risks are high Faster and more cost efficient to pursue projects jointly than alone Synergy! © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Relationship Marketing Building strong and lasting relationships is hard work and difficult to sustain. But I believe that in a world where the customer has so many options, even in narrow product-market segments, a personal relationship is the only way to retain customer loyalty. Regis McKenna
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Customer Relationship Marketing
Forming long-term relationships with customers that provide mutuallybeneficial solutions Cheaper to keep current customers coming back than to prospect for new ones. May require sacrificing short-term profits for long-term gains. © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Computing Customer Equity
Profit stream from customer acquisition costs
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Computing Customer Equity 60 50 40
Profit from Referrals
30 20
Profit from Increased Purchases
10 0 -10 -20
Base Profit Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5 Acquisition Cost
-30 -40 -50 © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Customer Acquisition Strategies High Retention Profit Potential
Low
Full Throttle
Pay as You Go
Selective
Restructure/ Divest
Short
Long
Acquisition Investment Recovery Time © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Aspects of Cost to Serve
Acquisition Costs
Production Costs
Distribution Costs
Service Costs Why do some customers cost more to serve than others? © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Customer Acquisition Rules
Acquire any customer as long as the discounted future value of the customer exceeds the acquisition costs for that customer. When you broaden the acquisition effort, be prepared for lower response rates. The greater its profits from retention, the greater a firm's customer acquisition investment should be. The higher the percentage of the initial acquisition investment that a firm recovers in the first period, the greater its acquisition investment should be. © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Developing and Maintaining Relationships: Acquiring Customers
Segment the market by value perceptions Target segments that appreciate value
Generate awareness Pricing
Segment attractiveness Competitive position ( & capability assessment) (promotion & communication)
Skimming or penetration
Trial Post-purchase service © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Switching Costs
Arising from:
investments in equipment, procedures, or people that make it costly or risky for a customer to switch to another firm’s products. perceived risk of making a bad choice
Other factors related to switching costs:
Platform considerations (inter-operability) Vendor Considerations (the lock-in effect)
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Customer Relationship and Retention Strategies
Is Customer Loyalty Profitable?
Claim 1: It costs less to serve loyal customers.
Claim 2: Loyal customers pay higher prices for the same bundle of benefits. Claim 3: Loyal customers market the
As opinion company. leaders & benchmarks
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Which Customers Are Really Profitable? Transaction High Profit
Low Profit
Relationship
Service provider Grocery retail Mail-order Brokerage
20% 15% 19% 18%
Service provider Grocery retail Mail-order Brokerage
30% 36% 31% 32%
Service provider Grocery retail Mail-order Brokerage
29% 34% 29% 33%
Service provider Grocery retail Mail-order Brokerage
21% 15% 21% 17%
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Loyalty Strategies Transaction
High Profit
Low Profit
Butterflies: Good fit High profit potential Transaction satisfaction Milk active accounts Cease investing Strangers: Little fit Lowest profit potential Make no investment Max transaction profit
Relationship True Friends: Good fit Best profit potential Consistent communication Attitudinal & behavioral loyalty Delight customers Barnacles: Limited fit Low profit potential Measure size and share of wallet Low share, up- and cross-sell Small wallet, strict cost control
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Relationship Marketers
Perform a long-term business planning
IBM plans function for their customers. businesses for her IT Help customers define their businesses, their users
markets, and their product-service needs.
MS provides anything for her users
Maintain high-level, multi-function access in customer companies. Sell systems of products and services. Draw on the full complement of company functions and services for support. © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Appendix: Inter-firm Learning
Issue: Must learn to have effective partnership, but too much information sharing can dilute source of competitive advantage Types of knowledge:
Explicit (migratory) Tacit (embedded)
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
Managing the Paradox
Want closest partnership possible to enhance learning Want loosely-coupled partnership to prevent unintended transfers of information Use caution! Cross-licensing agreements © Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2005
View more...
Comments