RV 144 - AIDS 2010
Short Description
Download RV 144 - AIDS 2010...
Description
RV 144: The Thai Phase III Trial and Development of a Globally-Effective, Multi-Clade HIV Vaccine Dr. Merlin Robb Deputy Director, Clinical Research US Military HIV Research Program (MHRP) Walter Reed Army Institute of Research HIV Vaccine: Quo Vadis AIDS 2010 20 July 2010
MHRP
Objectives
2
Overview of RV144 outcomes • Post-hoc hypothesis generating analyses
Update on ongoing research efforts • Correlates research
Product development plans for a globally-effective HIV vaccine
7 June 2010
RV 144
Vaccination and Follow-up Schedule HIV test, risk assessment and counseling
0.5 6-month vaccination schedule
1
2 3 years of follow-up (every 6 mo.)
ALVAC®-HIV (vCP1521) priming at week 0, 4, 12, 24 AIDSVAX® B/E gp120 boosting at week 12, 24
3
(time in years)
RV 144
Vaccine Efficacy Appears Highest 6-12 months 3.5 years after first vaccination: Protective Efficacy = 31.2% P = 0.04 95% CI: 1.1 – 52.1% No effect on viral load mITT
PP
month
Events
Efficacy
Events
Efficacy
6
16
54%
n/a
n/a
12
42
60%
21
68%
18
67
44%
41
41%
24
82
36%
53
27%
30
95
36%
62
31%
VE @ 12 months = 60% (Cox PH, 95% CI 22, 80)
Anti-gp120 Reciprocal Mean Geometric Titers1 VISIT 2 WEEKS POST VACCINE (V8)
24 WEEKS POST VACCINE (V9)
AFRIMS
VRC
FOLD FOLD DECREASE DECREASE (8:9 – A) (8:9- V)
AFRIMS
VRC
AFRIMS
VRC
A244
12450
2377
1300
240
9.58
9.90
MN
27820
3771
2326
367
11.96
10.28
ANTIGEN
1Courtesy
of Dr. Rick Koup, May 2010
RV 144
Baseline Risk-stratified Treatment Effects (mITT) Caveats: • Overall incidence was low • Risk was primarily heterosexual in low prevalence setting • 90% of infections subtype E Vaccine
Placebo
Treatment Effect
N
Endpoints
PY Rate %
N
Endpoints
PY Rate %
Efficacy
95% CI
Low
3,865
17
0.135
3,924
29
0.227
40.4%
-8.5, 67.2
Medium
2,369
12
0.157
2,292
22
0.299
47.6%
-6.0, 74.0
High
1,963
22
0.349
1,982
23
0.364
3.7%
-72.7, 46.3
VE for each risk category was statistically similar
RV 144
Baseline versus cumulative risk
Risk Assessment
Risk : Treatment Interaction
Baseline risk (pre-hoc analysis)
p = 0.21
“Ever” high / not ever high
p = 0.008
This may reflect the transient protective effect of the vaccine regimen rather than imply protection only in “lower risk” individuals
RV 144
RV 144 lessons
Protection from infection possible • No or minimal primary neutralizing antibody • Limited CD8 T cell immunity • Other immune effectors play a role
Protection seems greatest early and in low risk participants • Boosting may improve overall efficacy • Studies must consider risk variable
Mode of transmission Frequency of exposure Dose per exposure 8
7 June 2010
RV 144
Ongoing RV 144 Research
November 2009 • Immunogenicity studies • HIV virus characterization
May 2010: Correlates Pilot Studies begin • Collaboration with 30 US and international researchers • Using RV144 samples
Humoral and Innate Immunity T-cell immunity Host Genetics Animal Models
9
7 June 2010
MHRP
Goal: Globally Effective HIV Vaccine Effective in high-risk populations
Multi-clade protection against acquisition
GLOBALLY EFFECTIVE HIV VACCINE Durable, safe and effective
Globally accessible
Corollary: Efficacy trials are the only way to determine a correlate of immunity and establish a rational basis for HIV vaccine development. 10
MHRP
Vaccine Strategy: Guiding Principles
Reasonable concepts • •
Evaluate these in efficient efficacy trials • • •
11
Distinct from those previously tested, and Best represent the concept
Leverage a diversity of approaches Build incrementally on past successes Minimize risk
7 June 2010
MHRP
Product Development Plan Parallel product development pathways toward a globally effective HIV vaccine. BUILDING ON RV144
1
REGIONAL VACCINE STRATEGY Building on the RV144 regimen
2
DIVERSIFYING AND REFINING THE PORTFOLIO
APPROACH
Phase IIb efficacy trial with extended ALVAC/protein boosts, shorter follow-up: a) MSM Thai population b) High-risk heterosexuals in RSA
APPROACH • Multi-clade populations for study
GLOBAL VACCINE STRATEGY Pursuing diverse approaches toward a globally effective vaccine.
• Increase CD8 potency • Improve humoral response • Add primary neutralizing AB 7 June 2010
MHRP
Vaccine Downselection A known correlate (unlikely) would guide downselection In the absence of a correlate: •
If products generate similar immune responses, strongest response will be selected
•
If products generate distinct immune response, both concepts should be considered
Practical considerations inform selection: •
13
Availability, complexity, and cost
7 June 2010
MHRP
A Balanced Strategy 1
BUILDING ON RV144: A Regional Vaccine Strategy
2
DIVERSIFYING AND REFINING THE PORTFOLIO: A Global Vaccine Strategy
Objective: minimize risk and maximize the likelihood of achieving an effective HIV vaccine.
14
7 June 2010
View more...
Comments