the PowerPoint Presentation

Abina Mansah’s world Interpreting Gold Coast Supreme Court Records, SCT 5/4/19: Regina v Quamina Eddoo

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

In 1876, a young, enslaved girl escaped her captivity near the town of Saltpond in what is today Ghana.

Abina’s story Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Born in Asante, she had been enslaved in several households before Quamina Eddoo’s house near Saltpond, where she worked as a “housegirl”.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Abina fled to Cape Coast, a British colony where she was –by law –free, and found employment working for a Eurafrican translator named James Davis.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

With Davis’ help, she took her former master to court, where she argued that he should be imprisoned based on her experiences as a slave.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Neither the British magistrate nor the jury of local men sided with her, and her former master was exonerated.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Nevertheless, through her testimony we hear the voice of a young woman who forced the men of the court to here of her experiences, and whose words still convey her perspectives today.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

EXCAVATING VOICES – methods and ethics

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

What did it mean to be “colonized”, and how can the victims of history be redeemed? Colonialism is usually understood as a system and as a series of projects largely from the view of the colonizers.  The perspective of the colonizers is relatively easy to recover because it was the colonizers who wrote most of the documents, choose what went into the archive, etc.  But how can we recover the sub-altern voice of Africans? Can formally-trained scholars in a position of relative power do it? Is it possible to do at all?  Specifically, I wanted to aim at recovering the voice of one of the most dispossessed victims of history of all – a young, African woman of servile (or slave) class.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

• Young enslaved women don’t write many documents themselves. • In the documents in which enslaved youths appear, they are talked about but don’t do much talking themselves. • As a result, the voices of enslaved women are hidden beneath other, dominant voices, and must be excavated.

What are the difficulties? Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Why is it worth trying to excavate the voices of Africans?

• • • • •

Relevance? Authenticity? Power relations today? It’s the historians job? It increases the accuracy of our studies?

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

How can we hear the voices of young enslaved women from the colonial past? • Use new types of sources? • Oral histories/ oral traditions? • Archaeology? • Linguistic analysis (“words and things”)?

• Read old documents in a new way? • That’s what we’re doing with Abina’s testimony

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

My strategy for excavating Abina Mansah’s voice

• • • •

Contextualize! – thick analysis Understand the top-level voices Read the document carefully Make sense of Abina Mansah’s testimony in her own words

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

The context • Annexation of the Gold Coast Colony and constitution of the Gold Coast Protectorate in 1874. • Various British and international groups pressured the Crown to abolish slavery. • 1874 anti-slavery strategy engineered to satisfy the abolitionist British public while not dislocating the political and economic interests of the indigenous (and often slave-owning) elites on whom their ability to maintain their authority depended. • Therefore: – Liberation could only be achieved by individuals just leaving or going to court. – Young children, especially girls, could not leave easily, but also found it difficult to go to court.

Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

• British, middle class, Christian, abolitionist • Views of children – as dependants • Views of “paternal” authority and duty in Britain and in Gold Coast The magistrate was (usually) the sole judge and thus the principal audience. Everyone in the courtroom was performing (and trying to convince) him of their point of view.

The magistrates Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

Magistrates determined whether the individual was “enslaved” or “a customary dependant” • 1) did any money change hands? • 2) was the child physically abused? • 3) was the child called a slave (such local terms as “odonkwo” or “amperlay”) • 4) what sort of labor was the child required to do? • 5) did the child receive wages or compensation for labor provided?

The application of the law Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

How do they shape or alter testimony and judgments? • Interpreters – In this case the Euro-African James Davis. • Clerks – Usually locals, but in this case the magistrate himself. • Lawyers – James Hutton Brew. Usually friendly with magistrates. • Juries – important men, likely to be allies of slaveowners

Other actors Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz

 The court had a “code” made up of the magistrate’s understanding of the law cultural language in which he could be addressed. Some participants understood this language, others did not.

 Abina Mansah’s understanding of this language was very low. This hurt her case, but ironically makes it easier for us to hear her voice!

The “language” of the court Presentation developed by Trevor R. Getz